ITAC Assessment: UM0349
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UM0349
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2009
Principal Product paint ball markers
NAICS 339920: Sporting and Athletic Goods Manufacturing
SIC 3949: Sporting and Athletic Goods, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 100
Plant Area 86,620
ft2
Annual Production 300,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 4,800
hrs
Location (State) Indiana

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $45,734 1,360,315
kWh
Electricity Demand $38,789 3,922
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $21,469 1,859
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $19,509 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $19,509

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings
01 2.7221: Lower temperature during the winter season and vice-versa $10,327 $1,000 - - $10,327
-
MMBtu
02 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors $5,172 $1,840 $5,172
78,357
kWh
- -
03 2.7111: Reduce illumination to minimum necessary levels $3,531 $3,168 $1,317
39,178
kWh
$2,214
-
kW-mo/yr
-
04 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $479 $100 $198
5,902
kWh
$281
-
kW-mo/yr
-
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $19,509 $6,108 $6,687
123,437
kWh
$2,495
-
kW-mo/yr
$10,327
-
MMBtu
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $19,509 $6,108 $6,687
123,437
kWh
$2,495
-
kW-mo/yr
$10,327
-
MMBtu
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs