ITAC Assessment: UM0008
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UM0008
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1994
Principal Product Heat Treatment Services
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3398: Metal Heat Treating
Sales Range $1
M
to 5
M
# of Employees 65
Plant Area 51,000
ft2
Annual Production 111,501,485
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 7,200
hrs
Location (State) Michigan

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $105,139 2,009,086
kWh
Natural Gas $389,699 129,232
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $30,177 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $10,448

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings
01 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $4,721 $6,410 $4,721
90,856
kWh
-
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $680 $2,050 $680
11,137
kWh
-
03 2.3212: Optimize plant power factor $4,653 $6,900 $4,653
-
kWh
-
04 2.2136: Install / repair insulation on steam lines $394 $157 - $394
-
MMBtu
05 2.2514: Cover open tanks $8,446 $4,762 - $8,446
-
MMBtu
06 2.2414: Use waste heat from hot flue gases to preheat $11,283 $7,772 - $11,283
-
MMBtu
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $30,177 $28,051 $10,054
101,993
kWh
$20,123
-
MMBtu
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $10,448 $15,517 $10,054
101,993
kWh
$394
-
MMBtu
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs