ITAC Assessment: UL0216
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UL0216
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1999
Principal Product Injection-molded Plastic Pipe Fittings and Valves
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3089: Plastics Products, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 189
Plant Area 179,000
ft2
Annual Production 3,000,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 8,400
hrs
Location (State) Indiana

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $134,500 8,446,659
kWh
Electricity Demand $146,442 14,442
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $10,828 1,842
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $203,792 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Primary Product Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $2,573 $13,951 $1,346
84,701
kWh
$1,227
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
02 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $1,059 $20 $555
34,877
kWh
$504
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
03 3.6193: Install equipment (eg compactor) to reduce disposal costs $160 $500 - - $160
-
lb
-
04 4.711: Initiate a total quality management program $200,000 $75,000 - - - $200,000
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $203,792 $89,471 $1,901
119,578
kWh
$1,731
-
kW-mo/yr
$160
-
lb
$200,000
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED - - - - - -
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs