ITAC Assessment: UL0191
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UL0191
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1998
Principal Product Industrial and Fuel Ethanol
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2869: Industrial Organic Chemicals, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $1
M
to 5
M
# of Employees 73
Plant Area 245,000
ft2
Annual Production 3,000
Tgal
Production Hrs. Annual 7,488
hrs
Location (State) Kentucky

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Natural Gas $326,438 114,730
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $496,729 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Fees Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Administrative Changes Savings
01 2.3212: Optimize plant power factor $12,699 $13,313 $12,699 - - - -
02 2.8114: Change rate schedules or other changes in utility service $2,913 - - - - - $2,913
03 3.4131: Minimize contamination of water before treatment $390,882 $340,000 - $326,438
-
MMBtu
$31,200
-
Tgal
$33,244
-
lb
-
04 3.5313: Increase amount of waste recovered for resale $8,735 $8,500 - - - $8,735
-
lb
-
05 4.611: Begin a practice of predictive / preventative maintenance $81,500 $15,000 - - - - $81,500
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $496,729 $376,813 $12,699 $326,438
-
MMBtu
$31,200
-
Tgal
$41,979
-
lb
$84,413
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED - - - - - - -
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs