ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UF0156
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UF0156
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
See Complete Announcement
Grant Program - Open Solicitation
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Find Something New - Open Random Assessment MAIN ITAC SITE VERSION [FOR BETA TESTING ONLY]
University of Florida University of Florida
Assessment Year 1996
Principal Product Beef
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2011: Meat Packing Plants
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 100
Plant Area 40,000
ft2
Annual Production 52,000
units
Production Hrs. Annual 2,730
hrs
Location (State) Florida

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $105,649 2,536,635
kWh
Electricity Demand $16,911 4,884
kW-mo/yr
LPG $21,728 3,175
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $9,396 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $6,055

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $1,419 $779 $1,274
30,774
kWh
$145
-
kW-mo/yr
-
02 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $2,087 $2,971 $1,808
43,376
kWh
$279
-
kW-mo/yr
-
03 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $1,147 $650 $1,147
27,550
kWh
- -
04 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $1,417 $450 $1,417
29,308
kWh
- -
05 2.2621: Modify refrigeration system to operate at a lower pressure $1,922 $6,000 $1,922
44,549
kWh
- -
06 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $1,404 - - - $1,404
-
lb
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $9,396 $10,850 $7,568
175,557
kWh
$424
-
kW-mo/yr
$1,404
-
lb
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $6,055 $4,071 $4,372
100,234
kWh
$279
-
kW-mo/yr
$1,404
-
lb
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs