ITAC Assessment: UF0088
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UF0088
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1994
Principal Product Printed Books
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2759: Commercial Printing, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 220
Plant Area 225,000
ft2
Annual Production 4,000,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 6,864
hrs
Location (State) Florida

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $377,704 4,004,982
kWh
Natural Gas $6,495 710
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $41,600 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $25,151

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $8,234 $574 $8,234
87,632
kWh
02 2.3132: Recharge batteries on during off-peak demand periods $706 - $706
-
kWh
03 2.7144: Install spectral reflectors / delamp $546 $680 $546
4,982
kWh
04 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $15,197 $11,237 $15,197
161,782
kWh
05 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system $14,642 $15,300 $14,642
200,469
kWh
06 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $2,275 $925 $2,275
31,067
kWh
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $41,600 $28,716 $41,600
485,932
kWh
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $25,151 $16,799 $25,151
319,168
kWh
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs