ITAC Assessment: UF0076
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UF0076
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1994
Principal Product Various Printed Products
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3999: Manufacturing Industries, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $1
M
to 5
M
# of Employees 40
Plant Area 31,000
ft2
Annual Production 6,000,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 2,300
hrs
Location (State) Florida

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $43,929 400,059
kWh
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $4,139 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $2,517

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $935 $112 $935
8,499
kWh
02 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors $88 $64 $88
1,172
kWh
03 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $271 $1,680 $271
2,345
kWh
04 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $104 $80 $104
879
kWh
05 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $499 $1,123 $499
4,396
kWh
06 2.7232: Replace existing hvac unit with high efficiency model $891 $2,450 $891
8,206
kWh
07 2.7491: Insulate glazing, walls, ceilings, and roofs $1,351 $2,880 $1,351
12,309
kWh
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $4,139 $8,389 $4,139
37,806
kWh
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $2,517 $3,829 $2,517
23,152
kWh
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs