ITAC Assessment: UF0051
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1993
Principal Product Wood Trusses and Joists
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2439: Structural Wood Members, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $100
M
to 500
M
# of Employees 130
Plant Area 230,000
ft2
Annual Production 45,000,000
thousand feet
Production Hrs. Annual 6,000
hrs
Location (State) Florida

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $442,079 8,182,884
kWh
Natural Gas $160,708 52,955
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $79,923 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $3,768

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $5,311 $6,715 $5,311
91,735
kWh
02 2.7144: Install spectral reflectors / delamp $1,536 $5,520 $1,536
13,189
kWh
03 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $3,768 $7,202 $3,768
51,876
kWh
04 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $10,415 $9,640 $10,415
144,490
kWh
05 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $4,119 $2,875 $4,119
58,910
kWh
06 2.3137: Use power during off-peak periods $54,774 - $54,774
-
kWh
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $79,923 $31,952 $79,923
360,200
kWh
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $3,768 $7,202 $3,768
51,876
kWh
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs