ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UD1109
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UD1109
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
See Complete Announcement
Grant Program - Open Solicitation
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Find Something New - Open Random Assessment MAIN ITAC SITE VERSION [FOR BETA TESTING ONLY]
University of Dayton University of Dayton
Assessment Year 2025
Principal Product Packaging Products, including Gallon jugs, aerosol containers, and plastic bottles, etc.
NAICS 326160: Plastics Bottle Manufacturing
SIC 3085: Plastics Bottles
Sales Range less than $500
k
# of Employees 227
Plant Area 268,000
ft2
Annual Production 1,835,686,776
units
Production Hrs. Annual 8,760
hrs
Location (State) Ohio

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $2,069,472 56,965,788
kWh
Electricity Demand $628,074 106,390
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $3,840 -
Natural Gas $43,586 12,125
MMBtu
Waste Disposal Costs
Water Usage $62,698 14,365
Tgal
Water Disposal $12,839 1
Tgal
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS $2,820,509
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $92,877 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Personnel Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
01 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $23,965 $2,310 $19,601
539,971
kWh
$4,364
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
02 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $24,579 - $20,071
552,931
kWh
$4,508
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
03 2.4239: Eliminate or reduce compressed air usage $2,017 $2,784 $1,962
54,055
kWh
$55
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
04 2.2628: Utilize a less expensive cooling method $41,149 $75,000 $33,653
927,097
kWh
$7,496
-
kW-mo/yr
- -
05 2.7111: Reduce illumination to minimum necessary levels $1,167 $4,639 $211
5,804
kWh
$142
-
kW-mo/yr
$580 $234
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $92,877 $84,733 $75,498
2,079,858
kWh
$16,565
-
kW-mo/yr
$580 $234
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED - - - - - -
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs