ITAC Assessment: UD0948
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UD0948
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2016
Principal Product High Pressure Die-Cast Aluminum Automotive Parts
NAICS 331523: Nonferrous Metal Die-Casting Foundries
SIC 3363: Aluminum Die-Castings
Sales Range $100
M
to 500
M
# of Employees 907
Plant Area 418,855
ft2
Annual Production 87,098,073
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 7,200
hrs
Location (State) Ohio

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $3,026,944 56,966,360
kWh
Electricity Demand $455,759 98,340
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $23,139 -
Natural Gas $2,310,727 308,045
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $970,112 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $226,150

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Electricity Fees Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Administrative Changes Savings Water Consumption Savings
01 2.2414: Use waste heat from hot flue gases to preheat $353,342 $60,000 - - - $353,342
-
MMBtu
- - -
02 2.2511: Insulate bare equipment $23,367 $2,838 - - - $23,367
-
MMBtu
- - -
03 2.2437: Recover waste heat from equipment $49,905 $20,000 - - - $49,905
-
MMBtu
- - -
04 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $35,398 - $35,720
677,029
kWh
$4,478
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - $(-4,800.0) -
05 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $2,997 $50 $2,663
50,482
kWh
$334
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
06 2.7243: Improve air circulation with destratification fans / other methods $87,713 $52,000 $(-2,772.0)
(-52,536)
kWh
$(-333.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
- $90,818
-
MMBtu
- - -
07 2.7221: Lower temperature during the winter season and vice-versa $38,094 - - - - $38,094
-
MMBtu
- - -
08 2.3212: Optimize plant power factor $11,880 $60,000 - - $11,880 - - - -
09 3.4116: Meter recycled water (to reduce sewer charges) $105,009 $700 - - - - $105,009
-
Tgal
- -
10 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system $2,006 $5,000 $1,750
33,174
kWh
$256
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
11 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $64,945 $360,069 $52,232
990,000
kWh
$7,640
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - $5,073 -
12 3.4111: Use closed cycle process to minimize waste water production $195,456 $17,000 $(-729.0)
(-13,808)
kWh
$(-230.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
- - $99,503
-
Tgal
- $96,912
-
Tgal
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $970,112 $577,657 $88,864
1,684,341
kWh
$12,145
-
kW-mo/yr
$11,880 $555,526
-
MMBtu
$204,512
-
Tgal
$273 $96,912
-
Tgal
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $226,150 $412,069 $85,180
1,614,493
kWh
$11,785
-
kW-mo/yr
- $128,912
-
MMBtu
- $273 -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Electricity Fees Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Administrative Changes Savings Water Consumption Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs