ITAC Assessment: UD0629
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UD0629
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2001
Principal Product Ambient & cryogenically ground rubber and plastic
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3069: Fabricated Rubber Products, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 60
Plant Area 87,800
ft2
Annual Production 31,000,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 6,732
hrs
Location (State) Ohio

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $85,229 3,043,894
kWh
Electricity Demand $53,794 10,476
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $27,678 2,905
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $79,824 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $3,907

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Primary Raw Material Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
01 4.423: Move product using mechanical means $21,879 $25,000 - - $21,879 - - -
02 4.652: Replace existing equipment with more suitable substitutes $18,079 $15,000 n/a - - $17,329 - - $750
03 3.1192: Reduce scrap production $15,862 $6,000 - - $2,735 $6,395 $6,732 -
04 2.6212: Turn off equipment during breaks, reduce operating time $6,324 - $6,324
158,097
kWh
- - - - -
05 2.2511: Insulate bare equipment $5,835 $1,760 $4,222
150,797
kWh
$1,613
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
06 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck $5,200 $1,500 - - - $5,200 - -
07 2.6221: Use most efficient equipment at it's maximum capacity and less efficient equipment only when necessary $3,907 - $2,827
100,980
kWh
$1,080
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
08 2.3131: Reschedule plant operations or reduce load to avoid peaks $1,128 - - $1,128
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
09 2.4239: Eliminate or reduce compressed air usage $982 $250 $204
7,271
kWh
$778
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
10 3.4116: Meter recycled water (to reduce sewer charges) $628 $300 - - - $628 - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $79,824 $49,810 $13,577
417,145
kWh
$4,599
-
kW-mo/yr
$41,943 $12,223 $6,732 $750
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $3,907 - $2,827
100,980
kWh
$1,080
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Primary Raw Material Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs