Assessment Year | 1996 |
---|---|
Principal Product | fabric cutting and embroidery |
NAICS |
n/a
|
SIC | 2326: Men's and Boys' Work Clothing |
Sales Range | $10 M to 50M |
# of Employees | 550 |
Plant Area |
300,000
ft2
|
Annual Production | 10,000,000
pieces
|
Production Hrs. Annual | 6,100
hrs
|
Location (State) | Ohio |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Electricity Usage | $272,985 | 9,672,919 |
kWh
|
$0.028 |
Electricity Demand | $232,217 | 20,268 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$11.46 |
Natural Gas | $19,842 | 4,198 |
MMBtu
|
$4.73 |
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $52,348 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $9,536 |
Recommendations
# | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Water Disposal Savings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | 2.3212: Optimize plant power factor | $9,536 | $8,000 | - |
$9,536
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
02 | 2.2437: Recover waste heat from equipment | $3,342 | $3,500 | - | - |
$3,342
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
03 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $32,125 | $66,000 |
$14,116
672,333
kWh
|
$18,009
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
04 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $3,333 | $7,740 |
$1,278
60,961
kWh
|
$2,055
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
05 | 2.3131: Reschedule plant operations or reduce load to avoid peaks | $2,186 | - |
$934
44,549
kWh
|
$1,252
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
06 | 3.4116: Meter recycled water (to reduce sewer charges) | $1,826 | $200 | - | - | - |
$1,826
-
Tgal
|
|
TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $52,348 | $85,440 |
$16,328
777,843
kWh
|
$30,852
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$3,342
-
MMBtu
|
$1,826
-
Tgal
|
||
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $9,536 | $8,000 | - |
$9,536
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | ||
Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Water Disposal Savings |
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs