ITAC Assessment: UD0472
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1995
Principal Product non-clay brick, special shaped refractories
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3297: Nonclay Refractories
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 150
Plant Area 110,000
ft2
Annual Production 60,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 6,000
hrs
Location (State) Ohio

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $314,591 5,524,619
kWh
Natural Gas $190,040 47,510
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $42,353 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $21,998

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Administrative Changes Savings
01 2.8113: Purchase gas directly from a contract gas supplier $13,440 $30,000 - - - $13,440
02 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $4,193 $300 - - $4,193
-
Tgal
-
03 3.3121: Use screening, magnetic separation to remove contaminants $5,725 - $2,339
111,372
kWh
$148
-
MMBtu
$3,238
-
Tgal
-
04 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $4,365 $25,782 $4,129
55,393
kWh
- - $236
05 2.2437: Recover waste heat from equipment $14,630 $37,500 $14,630
266,120
kWh
- - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $42,353 $93,582 $21,098
432,885
kWh
$148
-
MMBtu
$7,431
-
Tgal
$13,676
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $21,998 $56,082 $4,129
55,393
kWh
- $4,193
-
Tgal
$13,676
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs