ITAC Assessment: UD0222
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UD0222
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1986
Principal Product ALUMINUM BUMPERS
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3471: Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and Coloring
Sales Range $50
M
to 100
M
# of Employees 120
Plant Area
n/a
Annual Production 1,200,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 4,200
hrs
Location (State) Ohio

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $517,000 9,242,087
kWh
Natural Gas $460,300 88,050
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $124,210 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $112,192

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings Administrative Changes Savings
01 2.3131: Reschedule plant operations or reduce load to avoid peaks $50,976 - $50,976
-
kWh
- -
02 2.4322: Use or replace with energy efficient substitutes $12,018 $6,000 $12,018
199,590
kWh
- -
03 2.2414: Use waste heat from hot flue gases to preheat $28,028 $25,000 - $28,028
-
MMBtu
-
04 2.2414: Use waste heat from hot flue gases to preheat $26,250 $27,000 - $26,250
-
MMBtu
-
05 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $6,938 $16,000 $7,845
133,939
kWh
$(-1,332.0)
-
MMBtu
$425
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $124,210 $74,000 $70,839
333,529
kWh
$52,946
-
MMBtu
$425
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $112,192 $68,000 $58,821
133,939
kWh
$52,946
-
MMBtu
$425
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs