| Assessment Year | 1986 |
|---|---|
| Principal Product | COOKWARE-IRON & ALUMINUM |
| NAICS |
n/a
|
| SIC | 3321: Gray and Ductile Iron Foundries |
| Sales Range | $10 M to 50M |
| # of Employees | 159 |
| Plant Area |
n/a
|
| Annual Production | 5,500
ton
|
| Production Hrs. Annual | 2,000
hrs
|
| Location (State) | Ohio |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
| Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity Usage | $376,161 | 5,305,393 |
kWh
|
$0.071 |
| Natural Gas | $186,926 | 37,645 |
MMBtu
|
$4.97 |
| TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
| RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $48,597 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
| IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $46,347 | |||
Recommendations
| # | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Natural Gas Savings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 2.3191: Use demand controller or load shedder | $23,091 | $20,000 |
$23,091
-
kWh
|
- | |
| 02 | 2.6241: Reduce temperature of process equipment when on standby | $4,025 | $1,250 |
$4,025
40,739
kWh
|
- | |
| 03 | 2.6212: Turn off equipment during breaks, reduce operating time | $2,250 | - |
$2,794
31,946
kWh
|
$(-544.0)
-
MMBtu
|
|
| 04 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $870 | $300 |
$1,248
22,274
kWh
|
$(-378.0)
-
MMBtu
|
|
| 05 | 2.1233: Analyze flue gas for proper air/fuel ratio | $2,111 | $1,000 | - |
$2,111
-
MMBtu
|
|
| 06 | 2.2414: Use waste heat from hot flue gases to preheat | $4,670 | $10,000 | - |
$4,670
-
MMBtu
|
|
| 07 | 2.2444: Use hot process fluids to preheat incoming process fluids | $8,336 | $18,000 | - |
$8,336
-
MMBtu
|
|
| 08 | 2.2444: Use hot process fluids to preheat incoming process fluids | $3,244 | $10,000 | - |
$3,244
-
MMBtu
|
|
| TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $48,597 | $60,550 |
$31,158
94,959
kWh
|
$17,439
-
MMBtu
|
||
| TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $46,347 | $60,550 |
$28,364
63,013
kWh
|
$17,983
-
MMBtu
|
||
| Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Natural Gas Savings | |||
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs