ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UA0244
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UA0244
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
See Complete Announcement
Grant Program - Open Solicitation
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Find Something New - Open Random Assessment MAIN ITAC SITE VERSION [FOR BETA TESTING ONLY]
University of Alabama University of Alabama
Assessment Year 2021
Principal Product Wastewater
NAICS 221320: Sewage Treatment Facilities
SIC 4952: Sewerage Systems
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 10
Plant Area 850,000
ft2
Annual Production 5,700,000
Tgal
Production Hrs. Annual 8,760
hrs
Location (State) Alabama

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $866,134 14,146,758
kWh
Electricity Demand $125,248 25,603
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $(-56,622.0) -
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS $934,760
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $460,118 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $3,477

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Electricity Fees Savings Personnel Changes Savings One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $3,477 $3,209 $3,321
54,242
kWh
$367
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-211.0) - -
02 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors $893 $282 $947
15,474
kWh
- $(-54.0) - -
03 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system $54,839 $180,000 $58,159
950,000
kWh
- $(-3,320.0) - -
04 2.3415: Use a fossil fuel engine to cogenerate electricity or motive power; and utilize heat $283,379 $2,501,328 $398,998
6,517,440
kWh
$43,676
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-25,277.0) $(-134,018.0) -
05 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $117,530 $1,000 - - - - $117,530
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $460,118 $2,685,819 $461,425
7,537,156
kWh
$44,043
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-28,862.0) $(-134,018.0) $117,530
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $3,477 $3,209 $3,321
54,242
kWh
$367
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-211.0) - -
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs