Assessment Year | 2018 |
---|---|
Principal Product | Electricity Generation |
NAICS | 221112: Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation |
SIC | 4911: Electric Services |
Sales Range | $100 M to 500M |
# of Employees | 50 |
Plant Area |
10,000
ft2
|
Annual Production | 5,455,700
units
|
Production Hrs. Annual | 8,760
hrs
|
Location (State) | Mississippi |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Electricity Usage | $9,499,880 | 146,152,000 |
kWh
|
$0.065 |
Natural Gas | $98,641,446 | 32,880,482 |
MMBtu
|
$3.00 |
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | $108,141,326 | |||
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $481,547 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $128,212 |
Recommendations
# | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Natural Gas Savings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | 2.2127: Flash condensate to produce lower pressure steam | $115,103 | $150,000 |
$115,103
1,770,800
kWh
|
- | |
02 | 2.4323: Use optimum size and capacity equipment | $96,921 | $15,000 |
$96,921
1,491,100
kWh
|
- | |
03 | 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system | $89,245 | $600,000 |
$89,245
1,373,000
kWh
|
- | |
04 | 2.2622: Replace existing chiller with high efficiency model | $73,737 | $75,000 |
$81,315
1,251,000
kWh
|
$(-7,578.0)
-
MMBtu
|
|
05 | 2.2211: Use optimum temperature | $67,812 | $300,000 | - |
$67,812
-
MMBtu
|
|
06 | 2.6221: Use most efficient equipment at it's maximum capacity and less efficient equipment only when necessary | $25,620 | $100 |
$25,620
394,200
kWh
|
- | |
07 | 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system | $13,109 | $3,750 |
$13,109
201,700
kWh
|
- | |
TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $481,547 | $1,143,850 |
$421,313
6,481,800
kWh
|
$60,234
-
MMBtu
|
||
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $128,212 | $153,750 |
$128,212
1,972,500
kWh
|
- | ||
Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Natural Gas Savings |
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs