ITAC Assessment: TT0116
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: TT0116
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2013
Principal Product Stainless Steel Kitchen Equipment
NAICS 332999: All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing
SIC 3431: Enameled Iron and Metal Sanitary Ware
Sales Range $100
M
to 500
M
# of Employees 180
Plant Area 144,000
ft2
Annual Production 0
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 6,240
hrs
Location (State) Tennessee

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $135,971 2,001,000
kWh
Electricity Demand $60,420 4,859
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $61,950 5,398
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $4,595 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $1,073

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Electricity Fees Savings
01 2.3212: Optimize plant power factor $1,609 $5,920 - - $1,609
02 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $837 $763 $619
9,105
kWh
$218
-
kW-mo/yr
-
03 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $1,077 $700 $409
6,012
kWh
$668
-
kW-mo/yr
-
04 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $1,073 $12,258 $670
9,855
kWh
$403
-
kW-mo/yr
-
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $4,595 $19,641 $1,698
24,972
kWh
$1,288
-
kW-mo/yr
$1,609
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $1,073 $12,258 $670
9,855
kWh
$403
-
kW-mo/yr
-
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs