ITAC Assessment: TT0110
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: TT0110
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2013
Principal Product N/A
NAICS 611310: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
SIC 8221: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Sales Range less than $500
k
# of Employees 6
Plant Area 6,300
ft2
Annual Production 0
units
Production Hrs. Annual 8,760
hrs
Location (State) Tennessee

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $39,800 497,568
kWh
Natural Gas $439,734 109,418
MMBtu
Coal $570,044 99,037
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $385,245 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $373,330

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings Coal Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings
01 2.1332: Convert combustion equipment to burn natural gas $362,330 $650,000 $39,800
497,568
kWh
- $174,000
-
MMBtu
$20,530
-
lb
$128,000
02 2.2442: Preheat combustion air with waste heat $11,000 $60,000 - $11,000
-
MMBtu
- - -
03 2.2136: Install / repair insulation on steam lines $11,915 $11,497 - $11,915
-
MMBtu
- - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $385,245 $721,497 $39,800
497,568
kWh
$22,915
-
MMBtu
$174,000
-
MMBtu
$20,530
-
lb
$128,000
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $373,330 $710,000 $39,800
497,568
kWh
$11,000
-
MMBtu
$174,000
-
MMBtu
$20,530
-
lb
$128,000
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs