ITAC Assessment: TS0023
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: TS0023
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1985
Principal Product NICKEL & CHROME PLATING
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3471: Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and Coloring
Sales Range $5
M
to 10
M
# of Employees 130
Plant Area
n/a
Annual Production 0
units
Production Hrs. Annual 7,200
hrs
Location (State) Michigan

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $185,544 3,333,529
kWh
Natural Gas $144,333 29,335
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $6,033 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Administrative Changes Savings
01 2.3212: Optimize plant power factor $1,342 $4,400 $1,342
-
kWh
-
02 2.3191: Use demand controller or load shedder $3,162 - $3,162
-
kWh
-
03 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $928 - $928
16,706
kWh
-
04 2.7111: Reduce illumination to minimum necessary levels $601 - $628
11,137
kWh
$(-27.0)
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $6,033 $4,400 $6,060
27,843
kWh
$(-27.0)
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED - - - -
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs