| Assessment Year | 2017 |
|---|---|
| Principal Product | Consumer Goods Paperboard Packaging |
| NAICS | 322219: Other Paperboard Container Manufacturing |
| SIC | 2611: Pulp Mills |
| Sales Range | $100 M to 500M |
| # of Employees | 450 |
| Plant Area |
606,781
ft2
|
| Annual Production | 1,548,729
pieces
|
| Production Hrs. Annual | 8,736
hrs
|
| Location (State) | New York |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
| Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity Usage | $844,023 | 26,229,921 |
kWh
|
$0.032 | |
| Electricity Demand | $274,687 | 47,260 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$5.81 | |
| Electricity Fees | $1,118,710 | - |
|
- | |
| Natural Gas | $181,336 | 38,835 |
MMBtu
|
$4.67 | |
| Waste Disposal Costs | |||||
| Water Usage | $10,657 | 4,053 |
Tgal
|
$2.63 | |
| TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | $2,429,413 | ||||
| RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $48,906 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
|||
| IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $46,795 | ||||
Recommendations
| # | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Personnel Changes Savings | One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms | $4,109 | - |
$3,288
102,755
kWh
|
$821
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
| 02 | 4.821: Pay bills on time to avoid late fees | $2,111 | - | - | - | - | $2,111 | |
| 03 | 3.1161: Eliminate/reduce an operation | $16,784 | $4,317 |
$(-132.0)
(-4,140)
kWh
|
$(-418.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$3,429 | $13,905 | |
| 04 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $347 | $524 |
$137
4,293
kWh
|
$34
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$145 | $31 | |
| 05 | 2.4321: Upgrade obsolete equipment | $25,555 | $120,000 |
$25,555
798,610
kWh
|
- | - | - | |
| TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $48,906 | $124,841 |
$28,848
901,518
kWh
|
$437
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$3,574 | $16,047 | ||
| TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $46,795 | $124,841 |
$28,848
901,518
kWh
|
$437
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$3,574 | $13,936 | ||
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs