| Assessment Year | 2009 |
|---|---|
| Principal Product | Aspen Evaporative Cooler Pads |
| NAICS | 321999: All Other Miscellaneous Wood Product Manufacturing |
| SIC | 2499: Wood Products, Not Elsewhere Classified |
| Sales Range | $10 M to 50M |
| # of Employees | 50 |
| Plant Area |
100,000
ft2
|
| Annual Production | 4,000,000
pieces
|
| Production Hrs. Annual | 5,360
hrs
|
| Location (State) | California |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
| Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity Usage | $75,143 | 660,000 |
kWh
|
$0.11 |
| Electricity Demand | $16,484 | 2,220 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$7.43 |
| Electricity Fees | $4,377 | - |
|
- |
| LPG | $9,438 | 524 |
MMBtu
|
$18.00 |
| TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
| RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $10,155 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
| IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $10,155 | |||
Recommendations
| # | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves | $2,300 | $360 |
$2,300
18,950
kWh
|
- | |
| 02 | 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required | $2,794 | $1,762 |
$2,599
21,409
kWh
|
$195
-
kW-mo/yr
|
|
| 03 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $1,815 | $3,010 |
$1,352
11,138
kWh
|
$463
-
kW-mo/yr
|
|
| 04 | 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms | $156 | $272 |
$112
921
kWh
|
$44
-
kW-mo/yr
|
|
| 05 | 2.7134: Use photocell controls | $2,873 | $7,164 |
$2,498
20,581
kWh
|
$375
-
kW-mo/yr
|
|
| 06 | 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors | $217 | $631 |
$168
1,381
kWh
|
$49
-
kW-mo/yr
|
|
| TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $10,155 | $13,199 |
$9,029
74,380
kWh
|
$1,126
-
kW-mo/yr
|
||
| TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $10,155 | $13,199 |
$9,029
74,380
kWh
|
$1,126
-
kW-mo/yr
|
||
| Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | |||
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs