ITAC Assessment: SF0253
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: SF0253
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2003
Principal Product Liquid and solid carbon dioxide
NAICS 325120: Industrial Gas Manufacturing
SIC 2813: Industrial Gases
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 15
Plant Area 152,460
ft2
Annual Production 0
units
Production Hrs. Annual 8,232
hrs
Location (State) California

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $737,755 7,656,235
kWh
Electricity Demand $209,488 18,501
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $4,361 733
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $116,784 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings
01 2.7134: Use photocell controls $715 $120 $611
6,335
kWh
$104
-
kW-mo/yr
02 2.2627: Use multiple-effect evaporators $88,799 $75,000 $88,799
921,153
kWh
-
03 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system $10,274 $9,590 $8,384
86,970
kWh
$1,890
-
kW-mo/yr
04 2.1311: Replace electrically-operated equipment with fossil fuel equipment $14,627 $50,000 $4,439
62,463
kWh
$10,188
-
kW-mo/yr
05 2.2437: Recover waste heat from equipment $2,369 $9,627 $2,369
24,570
kWh
-
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $116,784 $144,337 $104,602
1,101,491
kWh
$12,182
-
kW-mo/yr
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED - - - -
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs