ITAC Assessment: SF0228
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: SF0228
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2002
Principal Product Emulsion Polymers
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2821: Plastics Materials, Synthetic Resins, and Nonvulcanizable Elastomers
Sales Range $50
M
to 100
M
# of Employees 75
Plant Area 750,000
ft2
Annual Production 0
units
Production Hrs. Annual 8,568
hrs
Location (State) California

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $535,261 7,848,116
kWh
Natural Gas $31,154 12,729
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $511,472 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $35,802

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Administrative Changes Savings
01 2.7124: Make a practice of turning off lights when not needed $10,037 - $10,037
80,196
kWh
- -
02 2.4322: Use or replace with energy efficient substitutes $19,528 $8,550 $19,528
163,472
kWh
- -
03 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $16,476 $6,382 $16,476
128,470
kWh
- -
04 2.2622: Replace existing chiller with high efficiency model $122,694 $120,000 n/a $122,694
1,027,068
kWh
- -
05 2.7132: Install timers on light switches in little used areas $565 $480 $565
4,524
kWh
- -
06 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $19,326 $23,370 $19,326
158,131
kWh
- -
07 2.5123: Reduce fluid flow rates $35,747 $56,700 n/a $35,747
268,088
kWh
- -
08 2.5123: Reduce fluid flow rates $6,808 $10,340 $6,808
51,997
kWh
- -
09 2.5123: Reduce fluid flow rates $2,958 $5,070 $2,958
23,100
kWh
- -
10 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $89,821 $24,680 - $89,821
-
lb
-
11 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $177,582 $186,000 - $177,582
-
lb
-
12 3.6193: Install equipment (eg compactor) to reduce disposal costs $7,230 $19,300 - $7,230
-
lb
-
13 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $2,700 $5,000 - - $2,700
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $511,472 $465,872 $234,139
1,905,046
kWh
$274,633
-
lb
$2,700
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $35,802 $29,752 $35,802
286,601
kWh
- -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Administrative Changes Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs