ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: SF0215
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: SF0215
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
See Complete Announcement
Grant Program - Open Solicitation
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Find Something New - Open Random Assessment MAIN ITAC SITE VERSION [FOR BETA TESTING ONLY]
San Francisco State University San Francisco State University
Assessment Year 2001
Principal Product Catalyst Pellets
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3819:
Sales Range $50
M
to 100
M
# of Employees 80
Plant Area 1,350,360
ft2
Annual Production 45,700,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 8,736
hrs
Location (State) California

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $813,683 16,537,220
kWh
Natural Gas $1,579,580 282,907
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $951,630 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $292,968

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings
01 3.7392: Apply a protective coating to racks and tanks $3,452 - $3,452
110,678
kWh
-
02 2.1311: Replace electrically-operated equipment with fossil fuel equipment $9,984 $4,574 $9,984
393,120
kWh
-
03 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $1,711 $1,366 $1,711
35,997
kWh
-
04 2.7132: Install timers on light switches in little used areas $12,982 $13,500 $12,982
263,859
kWh
-
05 2.1311: Replace electrically-operated equipment with fossil fuel equipment $46,103 $50,000 $46,103
1,816,214
kWh
-
06 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $2,758 $3,291 $2,758
55,450
kWh
-
07 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors $6,547 $14,341 $6,547
133,067
kWh
-
08 2.7132: Install timers on light switches in little used areas $5,806 $14,760 n/a $5,806
118,015
kWh
-
09 2.1311: Replace electrically-operated equipment with fossil fuel equipment $1,329 $3,400 $1,329
52,416
kWh
-
10 2.1311: Replace electrically-operated equipment with fossil fuel equipment $33,374 $128,000 n/a $33,374
1,314,768
kWh
-
11 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $219,121 - - $219,121
-
lb
12 3.6193: Install equipment (eg compactor) to reduce disposal costs $3,216 - - $3,216
-
lb
13 3.6193: Install equipment (eg compactor) to reduce disposal costs $461,186 $60,000 n/a - $461,186
-
lb
14 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck $139,058 $35,200 n/a - $139,058
-
lb
15 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck $5,003 $5,111 - $5,003
-
lb
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $951,630 $333,543 $124,046
4,293,584
kWh
$827,584
-
lb
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $292,968 $77,317 $68,844
2,508,529
kWh
$224,124
-
lb
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs