ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: SF0063
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: SF0063
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
See Complete Announcement
Grant Program - Open Solicitation
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Find Something New - Open Random Assessment MAIN ITAC SITE VERSION [FOR BETA TESTING ONLY]
San Francisco State University San Francisco State University
Assessment Year 1995
Principal Product Sealants and Concrete Additives
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2891: Adhesives and Sealants
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 28
Plant Area 35,000
ft2
Annual Production 13,500,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 2,600
hrs
Location (State) California

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $146,854 1,055,979
kWh
Natural Gas $7,445 1,165
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $146,249 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $69,978

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings Other Liquid (haz) Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Solid Waste (haz) Savings
01 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $778 $1,618 $778
5,569
kWh
- - - -
02 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system $11,296 $10,135 $11,296
81,184
kWh
- - - -
03 2.7134: Use photocell controls $907 $348 $907
6,448
kWh
- - - -
04 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $1,331 $1,426 $1,331
9,672
kWh
- - - -
05 2.4314: Use synthetic lubricant $1,308 $2,402 $1,308
9,379
kWh
- - - -
06 2.3212: Optimize plant power factor $1,978 $2,231 $1,978
-
kWh
- - - -
07 2.3415: Use a fossil fuel engine to cogenerate electricity or motive power; and utilize heat $72,078 $358,000 $146,293
1,055,979
kWh
$(-74,215.0)
-
MMBtu
- - -
08 3.6112: Use filter and drying oven to reduce sludge volume $31,953 $10,793 - - $31,953
-
gal
- -
09 3.6112: Use filter and drying oven to reduce sludge volume $5,603 $9,769 - - - - $5,603
-
lb
10 3.6112: Use filter and drying oven to reduce sludge volume $11,374 $9,769 - - - - $11,374
-
lb
11 3.5315: Lease / purchase baler; sell cardboard to recycler $7,643 $8,000 - - - $7,643
-
lb
-
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $146,249 $414,491 $163,891
1,168,231
kWh
$(-74,215.0)
-
MMBtu
$31,953
-
gal
$7,643
-
lb
$16,977
-
lb
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $69,978 $51,510 $13,405
96,425
kWh
- $31,953
-
gal
$7,643
-
lb
$16,977
-
lb
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings Other Liquid (haz) Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Solid Waste (haz) Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs