ITAC Assessment: SF0059
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: SF0059
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1995
Principal Product Chocolate Bars and Chips
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2066: Chocolate and Cocoa Products
Sales Range $50
M
to 100
M
# of Employees 200
Plant Area 700,000
ft2
Annual Production 25,000
ton
Production Hrs. Annual 6,000
hrs
Location (State) California

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $648,664 7,730,950
kWh
Natural Gas $143,484 34,346
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $570,892 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $193,474

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings
01 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $3,715 $3,548 $3,715
44,256
kWh
- -
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $9,741 $25,412 $9,741
116,061
kWh
- -
03 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $6,509 $2,695 $6,509
77,667
kWh
- -
04 2.1243: Use heat from boiler blowdown to preheat boiler feed water $5,861 $8,820 - $5,861
-
MMBtu
-
05 2.3132: Recharge batteries on during off-peak demand periods $699 - $699
-
kWh
- -
06 2.4239: Eliminate or reduce compressed air usage $638 $550 $638
7,620
kWh
- -
07 2.3212: Optimize plant power factor $1,778 $3,588 $1,778
-
kWh
- -
08 2.3415: Use a fossil fuel engine to cogenerate electricity or motive power; and utilize heat $367,210 $633,645 $550,402
6,600,528
kWh
$(-183,192.0)
-
MMBtu
-
09 2.6218: Turn off equipment when not in use $2,569 - $2,569
30,481
kWh
- -
10 3.4111: Use closed cycle process to minimize waste water production $172,172 $282,160 - - $172,172
-
Tgal
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $570,892 $960,418 $576,051
6,876,613
kWh
$(-177,331.0)
-
MMBtu
$172,172
-
Tgal
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $193,474 $314,365 $21,302
245,604
kWh
- $172,172
-
Tgal
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs