ITAC Assessment: SD0617
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: SD0617
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2021
Principal Product Wastewater treatment
NAICS 221320: Sewage Treatment Facilities
SIC 4952: Sewerage Systems
Sales Range less than $500
k
# of Employees 25
Plant Area 27,880,000
ft2
Annual Production 9,125,000
Tgal
Production Hrs. Annual 8,736
hrs
Location (State) California

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $2,329,347 20,232,189
kWh
Electricity Demand $1,541,964 32,832
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $3,064,830 -
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS $6,936,141
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $516,355 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $515,892

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Electricity Fees Savings
01 2.4321: Upgrade obsolete equipment $387,076 $608,562 $232,873
2,023,219
kWh
$154,203
-
kW-mo/yr
-
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $101,052 $3,024,848 $77,578
673,999
kWh
$23,039
-
kW-mo/yr
$435
03 2.4322: Use or replace with energy efficient substitutes $27,764 $41,000 $17,792
154,584
kWh
$9,972
-
kW-mo/yr
-
04 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors $463 $378 $463
4,025
kWh
- -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $516,355 $3,674,788 $328,706
2,855,827
kWh
$187,214
-
kW-mo/yr
$435
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $515,892 $3,674,410 $328,243
2,851,802
kWh
$187,214
-
kW-mo/yr
$435
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs