| Assessment Year | 2002 |
|---|---|
| Principal Product | Aluminum heat sinks |
| NAICS |
n/a
|
| SIC | 3354: Aluminum Extruded Products |
| Sales Range | $10 M to 50M |
| # of Employees | 87 |
| Plant Area |
40
ft2
|
| Annual Production | 100,000
pieces
|
| Production Hrs. Annual | 6,732
hrs
|
| Location (State) | California |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
| Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity Usage | $116,703 | 1,026,580 |
kWh
|
$0.11 |
| Electricity Demand | $23,532 | 2,841 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$8.28 |
| Electricity Fees | $1,446 | - |
|
- |
| TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
| RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $107,602 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
| IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $23,370 | |||
Recommendations
| # | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Other Liquid (haz) Savings | Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings | Personnel Changes Savings | Administrative Changes Savings | One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves | $17,870 | $520 |
$15,817
139,113
kWh
|
$2,053
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
| 02 | 2.4239: Eliminate or reduce compressed air usage | $9,208 | $20,000 |
$6,653
58,514
kWh
|
$2,555
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
| 03 | 2.7134: Use photocell controls | $8,501 | $9,000 |
$5,596
49,218
kWh
|
$2,905
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
| 04 | 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system | $7,056 | $14,800 |
$6,385
56,163
kWh
|
$671
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
| 05 | 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required | $3,105 | - |
$2,517
22,138
kWh
|
$588
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
| 06 | 3.6193: Install equipment (eg compactor) to reduce disposal costs | $5,500 | $10,000 | - | - | - |
$5,500
-
lb
|
- | - | - | |
| 07 | 2.2628: Utilize a less expensive cooling method | $11,000 | - | - | - |
$11,000
-
gal
|
- | - | - | - | |
| 08 | 3.2176: Increase use of automation | $42,640 | $20,000 | - | - | - | - | $42,640 | - | - | |
| 09 | 3.2176: Increase use of automation | $2,296 | $3,500 | - | - | - | - | - | - | $2,296 | |
| 10 | 2.8123: Pay utility bills on time | $426 | - | - | - | - | - | - | $426 | - | |
| TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $107,602 | $77,820 |
$36,968
325,146
kWh
|
$8,772
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$11,000
-
gal
|
$5,500
-
lb
|
$42,640 | $426 | $2,296 | ||
| TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $23,370 | $10,520 |
$15,817
139,113
kWh
|
$2,053
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- |
$5,500
-
lb
|
- | - | - | ||
| Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Other Liquid (haz) Savings | Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings | Personnel Changes Savings | Administrative Changes Savings | One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings | |||
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs