ITAC Assessment: SD0250
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: SD0250
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2000
Principal Product Aluminum extrusion
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3354: Aluminum Extruded Products
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 380
Plant Area 216,000
ft2
Annual Production 20,000
ton
Production Hrs. Annual 7,200
hrs
Location (State) California

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $1,109,226 24,573,857
kWh
Electricity Demand $437,274 42,567
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $3,588 -
Natural Gas $1,360,222 421,389
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $366,557 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $44,752

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Other Liquid (haz) Savings Administrative Changes Savings
01 2.1311: Replace electrically-operated equipment with fossil fuel equipment $45,106 $210,000 $45,106
998,242
kWh
$13,747
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-13,747.0)
-
MMBtu
- - -
02 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $44,752 $600 $38,845
859,613
kWh
$18,387
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - $(-12,480.0)
03 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system $1,942 $4,100 $1,633
36,049
kWh
$309
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
04 2.2628: Utilize a less expensive cooling method $8,901 $40,000 $6,474
143,318
kWh
$2,427
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
05 2.2427: Use waste heat from hot flue gases to preheat incoming fluids $3,256 $8,000 - - $3,256
-
MMBtu
- - -
06 3.6193: Install equipment (eg compactor) to reduce disposal costs $148,200 $8,000 - - - - $148,200
-
gal
-
07 3.4111: Use closed cycle process to minimize waste water production $97,460 $135,000 - - - $97,460
-
Tgal
- -
08 3.6193: Install equipment (eg compactor) to reduce disposal costs $11,240 $7,900 - - - - - $11,240
09 3.6112: Use filter and drying oven to reduce sludge volume $5,000 $12,500 - - - - - $5,000
10 3.8136: Switch to a solvent that can be cleaned and re-used $700 - - - - - - $700
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $366,557 $426,100 $92,058
2,037,222
kWh
$34,870
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-10,491.0)
-
MMBtu
$97,460
-
Tgal
$148,200
-
gal
$4,460
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $44,752 $600 $38,845
859,613
kWh
$18,387
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - $(-12,480.0)
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Other Liquid (haz) Savings Administrative Changes Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs