ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: ORS004
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: ORS004
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
See Complete Announcement
Grant Program - Open Solicitation
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Find Something New - Open Random Assessment MAIN ITAC SITE VERSION [FOR BETA TESTING ONLY]
Oregon State University Oregon State University
Assessment Year 1999
Principal Product Frozen and canned fish
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2091: Canned and Cured Fish and Seafoods
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 275
Plant Area 35,000
ft2
Annual Production 9,711,367
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 4,080
hrs
Location (State) Alaska

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $469,912 3,218,054
kWh
LPG $28,295 928
MMBtu
Fuel Oil #2 $162,843 29,712
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $580,651 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $65,679

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Fuel Oil #2 Savings Water Disposal Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Water Consumption Savings Primary Product Savings
01 2.2621: Modify refrigeration system to operate at a lower pressure $24,048 - $24,048
164,713
kWh
- - - - - - -
02 2.3415: Use a fossil fuel engine to cogenerate electricity or motive power; and utilize heat $324,184 $540,530 $496,125
3,218,054
kWh
$(-171,941.0)
-
MMBtu
- - - - - -
03 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $3,758 $4,840 $2,427
16,706
kWh
- - $957 $374 - - -
04 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $11,658 $19,518 $11,658
79,719
kWh
- - - - - - -
05 3.1191: Change procedures / equipment / operating conditions $163,623 $60,000 - - - $(-27,005.0) - $(-127,080.0) - $317,708
06 4.425: Eliminate/reduce redundant inspections $14,000 $6,360 - - - $14,000 - - - -
07 4.323: Optimize lot sizes to reduce inventory carrying costs $10,860 $6,170 - - - $10,860 - - - -
08 4.323: Optimize lot sizes to reduce inventory carrying costs $8,525 $1,270 - - - $8,410 - - $115
-
Tgal
-
09 3.4151: Minimize water usage $14,760 $6,800 $(-2,770.0)
(-19,050)
kWh
- $17,530
-
Tgal
- - - - -
10 3.4111: Use closed cycle process to minimize waste water production $2,305 $1,725 $(-630.0)
(-4,396)
kWh
- - - - - $2,935
-
Tgal
-
11 3.4151: Minimize water usage $2,930 - - - - - - - $2,930
-
Tgal
-
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $580,651 $647,213 $530,858
3,455,746
kWh
$(-171,941.0)
-
MMBtu
$17,530
-
Tgal
$7,222 $374 $(-127,080.0) $5,980
-
Tgal
$317,708
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $65,679 $32,428 $35,363
242,088
kWh
- $17,530
-
Tgal
$9,367 $374 - $3,045
-
Tgal
-
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Fuel Oil #2 Savings Water Disposal Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Water Consumption Savings Primary Product Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs