ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: OR0425
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: OR0425
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
See Complete Announcement
Grant Program - Open Solicitation
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Find Something New - Open Random Assessment MAIN ITAC SITE VERSION [FOR BETA TESTING ONLY]
Oregon State University Oregon State University
Assessment Year 2002
Principal Product MDF
NAICS 321219: Reconstituted Wood Product Manufacturing
SIC 2493: Reconstituted Wood Products
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 150
Plant Area
n/a
Annual Production 1,000,000
thousand feet
Production Hrs. Annual 7,200
hrs
Location (State) Oregon

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $1,534,529 84,246,000
kWh
Electricity Demand $353,847 2,067,168
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $2,727,629 719,286
MMBtu
LPG $43,467 4,896
MMBtu
Fuel Oil #2 $20,230 3,846
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $2,075,750 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $3,015

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Other Energy Savings Personnel Changes Savings Primary Raw Material Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Primary Product Savings
01 2.2437: Recover waste heat from equipment $1,195,313 $104,295 - - - - $(-180,687.0) - $1,376,000
02 4.441: Install automatic packing equipment $484,000 $420,000 - - - $400,000 - $84,000 -
03 2.6242: Minimize operation of equipment maintained in standby condition $121,380 $120,000 n/a $121,000
3,380,000
kWh
$380
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
04 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck $190,600 $553,000 $248,100
6,936,000
kWh
$30,100
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-4,600.0)
-
MMBtu
- - $(-83,000.0) -
05 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $3,015 - $2,600
72,850
kWh
$415
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
06 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $7,764 $18,975 $6,697
187,596
kWh
$1,067
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
07 2.4322: Use or replace with energy efficient substitutes $73,678 $282,688 $63,538
1,779,763
kWh
$10,140
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $2,075,750 $1,498,958 $441,935
12,356,209
kWh
$42,102
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-4,600.0)
-
MMBtu
$400,000 $(-180,687.0) $1,000 $1,376,000
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $3,015 - $2,600
72,850
kWh
$415
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Other Energy Savings Personnel Changes Savings Primary Raw Material Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Primary Product Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs