Assessment Year | 1997 |
---|---|
Principal Product | Beer |
NAICS |
n/a
|
SIC | 2082: Malt Beverages |
Sales Range | $10 M to 50M |
# of Employees | 132 |
Plant Area |
120,200
ft2
|
Annual Production | 117,904
bbl
|
Production Hrs. Annual | 0
hrs
|
Location (State) | Oregon |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Electricity Usage | $153,791 | 3,095,545 |
kWh
|
$0.050 |
Electricity Demand | $2,382 | 9,240 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$0.26 |
Electricity Fees | $117 | - |
|
- |
Natural Gas | $114,778 | 32,009 |
MMBtu
|
$3.59 |
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $49,946 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $36,535 |
Recommendations
# | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Electricity Fees Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Water Disposal Savings | Water Consumption Savings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | 2.8114: Change rate schedules or other changes in utility service | $13,502 | - | - | - | $13,502 | - | - | - | |
02 | 2.3212: Optimize plant power factor | $1,070 | $3,200 | - | - | $1,070 | - | - | - | |
03 | 2.1231: Establish burner maintenance schedule for boilers | $9,530 | - |
$960
21,981
kWh
|
$680
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- |
$7,890
-
MMBtu
|
- | - | |
04 | 2.1233: Analyze flue gas for proper air/fuel ratio | $450 | $500 | - | - | - |
$450
-
MMBtu
|
- | - | |
05 | 2.2621: Modify refrigeration system to operate at a lower pressure | $4,881 | $1,560 |
$4,881
112,251
kWh
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
06 | 2.2621: Modify refrigeration system to operate at a lower pressure | $4,300 | - |
$4,300
99,062
kWh
|
- | - | - | - | - | |
07 | 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors | $2,988 | $5,910 |
$2,605
60,082
kWh
|
$383
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | - | - | |
08 | 3.4151: Minimize water usage | $4,000 | - | - | - | - | - |
$4,000
-
Tgal
|
- | |
09 | 3.5311: Recover and reuse waste material | - | $250 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
10 | 3.4111: Use closed cycle process to minimize waste water production | $3,460 | $610 | - | - | - | - |
$3,460
-
Tgal
|
- | |
11 | 3.4111: Use closed cycle process to minimize waste water production | $3,460 | $910 | - | - | - | - |
$3,460
-
Tgal
|
- | |
12 | 3.4151: Minimize water usage | $2,305 | - |
$391
11,723
kWh
|
- | - | - |
$1,526
-
Tgal
|
$388
-
Tgal
|
|
TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $49,946 | $12,940 |
$13,137
305,099
kWh
|
$1,063
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$14,572 |
$8,340
-
MMBtu
|
$12,446
-
Tgal
|
$388
-
Tgal
|
||
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $36,535 | $7,020 |
$8,256
192,848
kWh
|
$1,063
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$13,502 |
$8,340
-
MMBtu
|
$4,986
-
Tgal
|
$388
-
Tgal
|
||
Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Electricity Fees Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Water Disposal Savings | Water Consumption Savings |
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs