| Assessment Year | 1990 |
|---|---|
| Principal Product | PLYWOOD |
| NAICS |
n/a
|
| SIC | 2436: Softwood Veneer and Plywood |
| Sales Range | $10 M to 50M |
| # of Employees | 340 |
| Plant Area |
n/a
|
| Annual Production | 168,000
thousand feet
|
| Production Hrs. Annual | 6,120
hrs
|
| Location (State) | Oregon |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
| Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity Usage | $591,936 | 22,694,901 |
kWh
|
$0.026 |
| Wood | $1,019,592 | 640,889 |
MMBtu
|
$1.59 |
| TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
| RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $94,320 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
| IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $74,529 | |||
Recommendations
| # | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Wood Savings | Administrative Changes Savings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves | $37,102 | $10,000 |
$37,102
1,490,621
kWh
|
- | - | |
| 02 | 2.3212: Optimize plant power factor | $27,304 | $21,600 |
$27,304
-
kWh
|
- | - | |
| 03 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $9,110 | $9,180 |
$4,054
177,608
kWh
|
- | $5,056 | |
| 04 | 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors | $1,013 | $2,129 |
$1,013
41,618
kWh
|
- | - | |
| 05 | 2.2414: Use waste heat from hot flue gases to preheat | $10,133 | $41,895 | - |
$10,133
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
| 06 | 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system | $3,596 | $12,900 |
$3,596
151,231
kWh
|
- | - | |
| 07 | 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms | $6,062 | $25,625 |
$6,062
247,069
kWh
|
- | - | |
| TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $94,320 | $123,329 |
$79,131
2,108,147
kWh
|
$10,133
-
MMBtu
|
$5,056 | ||
| TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $74,529 | $42,909 |
$69,473
1,709,847
kWh
|
- | $5,056 | ||
| Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Wood Savings | Administrative Changes Savings | |||
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs