ITAC Assessment: OR0090
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: OR0090
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1990
Principal Product PLASTIC PIPE
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3084: Plastics Pipe
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 100
Plant Area
n/a
Annual Production 23,900,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 8,736
hrs
Location (State) Oregon

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $252,342 5,463,951
kWh
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $75,141 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $65,125

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Administrative Changes Savings
01 2.6121: Reduce hot water temperature to the minimum required $64,713 $5,000 $(-11,937.0)
(-264,654)
kWh
$76,650
02 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $412 $509 $412
9,086
kWh
-
03 2.2511: Insulate bare equipment $1,562 $3,277 $1,562
41,032
kWh
-
04 2.2621: Modify refrigeration system to operate at a lower pressure $1,098 $2,400 $1,098
28,722
kWh
-
05 2.3212: Optimize plant power factor $687 $1,950 $687
-
kWh
-
06 2.8114: Change rate schedules or other changes in utility service $6,669 $22,569 $7,769
-
kWh
$(-1,100.0)
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $75,141 $35,705 $(-409.0)
(-185,814)
kWh
$75,550
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $65,125 $5,509 $(-11,525.0)
(-255,568)
kWh
$76,650
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Administrative Changes Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs