ITAC Assessment: OK0534
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: OK0534
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1997
Principal Product Service line equipment
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3531: Construction Machinery and Equipment
Sales Range $100
M
to 500
M
# of Employees 1,080
Plant Area 780,000
ft2
Annual Production 8,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 2,496
hrs
Location (State) Oklahoma

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $887,181 17,061,255
kWh
Electricity Demand $175,471 47,120
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $1,680 -
Natural Gas $292,305 96,259
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $461,093 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $446,393

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings
01 2.3192: Use fossil fuel powered generator during peak demand periods $285,720 $575,000 - $39,361
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-187,913.0)
-
MMBtu
- - $56,008 $378,264
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $128,530 $202,500 $141,102
2,310,375
kWh
- $(-7,658.0)
-
MMBtu
- - $(-4,914.0) -
03 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $7,249 $124,654 $6,478
124,560
kWh
$2,065
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - $(-1,294.0) -
04 2.1311: Replace electrically-operated equipment with fossil fuel equipment $9,484 $18,600 $12,223
235,053
kWh
- $(-2,739.0)
-
MMBtu
- - - -
05 4.514: Re-arrange equipment layout to reduce handling costs $6,240 $268,000 - - - - - $6,240 -
06 3.1227: Use counter-current rinsing to reduce rinse water volume (gravure) $5,542 $27,375 - - - $11,112
-
Tgal
- $(-5,570.0) -
07 3.1227: Use counter-current rinsing to reduce rinse water volume (gravure) $5,196 $1,000 - - $1,432
-
MMBtu
$3,764
-
Tgal
- - -
08 2.2437: Recover waste heat from equipment $3,814 $732 - - $3,814
-
MMBtu
- - - -
09 2.2511: Insulate bare equipment $3,414 $2,250 $3,414
65,651
kWh
- - - - - -
10 2.2511: Insulate bare equipment $1,464 $485 $1,464
28,136
kWh
- - - - - -
11 3.1227: Use counter-current rinsing to reduce rinse water volume (gravure) $2,350 $35,000 - - - $2,350
-
Tgal
- - -
12 2.2511: Insulate bare equipment $1,232 $1,004 - - $1,232
-
MMBtu
- - - -
13 3.5316: Contract a wood pallet recycling company $858 - - - - - $858
-
lb
- -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $461,093 $1,256,600 $164,681
2,763,775
kWh
$41,426
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-191,832.0)
-
MMBtu
$17,226
-
Tgal
$858
-
lb
$50,470 $378,264
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $446,393 $949,861 $159,803
2,669,988
kWh
$41,426
-
kW-mo/yr
$(-193,064.0)
-
MMBtu
$14,876
-
Tgal
$858
-
lb
$44,230 $378,264
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs