Assessment Year | 2019 |
---|---|
Principal Product | Pharmaceutical equipment |
NAICS | 325212: Synthetic Rubber Manufacturing |
SIC | 2822: Synthetic Rubber (Vulcanizable Elastomers) |
Sales Range | $50 M to 100M |
# of Employees | 215 |
Plant Area |
200,000
ft2
|
Annual Production | 4,200,000,000
pieces
|
Production Hrs. Annual | 6,000
hrs
|
Location (State) | North Carolina |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Electricity Usage | $1,156,353 | 19,716,167 |
kWh
|
$0.059 |
Electricity Demand | $220,781 | 35,443 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$6.23 |
Natural Gas | $476,241 | 99,086 |
MMBtu
|
$4.81 |
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | $1,853,375 | |||
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $194,564 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $68,940 |
Recommendations
# | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Ancillary Material Cost Savings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $59,445 | $139,040 |
$30,570
520,727
kWh
|
$28,875
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
02 | 2.1223: Install smaller boiler (increase high fire duty cycle) | $9,495 | $1,000 | - | - |
$9,495
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
03 | 2.2628: Utilize a less expensive cooling method | $13,881 | $30,000 |
$8,961
152,650
kWh
|
$4,920
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
04 | 2.2437: Recover waste heat from equipment | $34,280 | $75,000 |
$(-31,698.0)
(-540,000)
kWh
|
$(-4,644.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$70,622
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
05 | 2.3415: Use a fossil fuel engine to cogenerate electricity or motive power; and utilize heat | $77,463 | $300,000 |
$66,918
1,140,000
kWh
|
$47,423
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$(-31,878.0)
-
MMBtu
|
$(-5,000.0) | |
TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $194,564 | $545,040 |
$74,751
1,273,377
kWh
|
$76,574
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$48,239
-
MMBtu
|
$(-5,000.0) | ||
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $68,940 | $140,040 |
$30,570
520,727
kWh
|
$28,875
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$9,495
-
MMBtu
|
- |
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs