Assessment Year | 2000 |
---|---|
Principal Product | Cotton and polyester yarns |
NAICS |
n/a
|
SIC | 2284: Thread Mills |
Sales Range | $50 M to 100M |
# of Employees | 220 |
Plant Area |
430,000
ft2
|
Annual Production | 55,000,000
lb
|
Production Hrs. Annual | 8,760
hrs
|
Location (State) | North Carolina |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Electricity Usage | $1,896,978 | 66,840,564 |
kWh
|
$0.028 |
Electricity Demand | $558,031 | 105,266 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$5.30 |
Electricity Fees | $718 | - |
|
- |
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $39,472 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $20,602 |
Recommendations
# | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Water Disposal Savings | Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors | $3,541 | $7,971 |
$2,818
99,648
kWh
|
$723
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
02 | 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms | $9,464 | $865 |
$7,531
266,120
kWh
|
$1,933
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
03 | 2.2625: Chill water to the highest temperature possible | $4,647 | - | - |
$4,647
-
kW-mo/yr
|
- | - | |
04 | 3.5315: Lease / purchase baler; sell cardboard to recycler | $108 | $200 | - | - | - |
$108
-
lb
|
|
05 | 3.4116: Meter recycled water (to reduce sewer charges) | $18,762 | $3,000 | - | - |
$18,762
-
Tgal
|
- | |
06 | 3.4115: Recover and reuse cooling water | $2,950 | $2,000 | - | - |
$2,950
-
Tgal
|
- | |
TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $39,472 | $14,036 |
$10,349
365,768
kWh
|
$7,303
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$21,712
-
Tgal
|
$108
-
lb
|
||
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $20,602 | $10,836 |
$10,349
365,768
kWh
|
$7,303
-
kW-mo/yr
|
$2,950
-
Tgal
|
- | ||
Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Electricity Demand Savings | Water Disposal Savings | Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings |
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs