ITAC Assessment: NC0139
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: NC0139
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1998
Principal Product Aluminum foil
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3353: Aluminum Sheet, Plate, and Foil
Sales Range $100
M
to 500
M
# of Employees 286
Plant Area 200,000
ft2
Annual Production 100,000,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 8,760
hrs
Location (State) North Carolina

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $1,005,042 39,118,113
kWh
Electricity Demand $567,223 66,110
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $45,146 -
Natural Gas $2,026,000 516,448
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $523,401 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $3,424

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Other Liquid (haz) Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Increase in Production Savings
01 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system $14,306 $18,000 $10,506
183,763
kWh
$3,800
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
02 2.4239: Eliminate or reduce compressed air usage $3,424 $1,800 $2,354
91,735
kWh
$1,070
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
03 2.1113: Reduce combustion air flow to optimum $34,875 $2,500 $(-388.0)
(-15,240)
kWh
$(-175.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
$35,438
-
MMBtu
- - -
04 2.2424: Use heat in flue gases to preheat products or materials $5,815 $25,000 $(-925.0)
(-36,049)
kWh
$(-422.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
$7,162
-
MMBtu
- - -
05 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $42,277 $70,000 $14,771
575,029
kWh
$7,506
-
kW-mo/yr
- - $20,000
-
lb
-
06 3.3133: Use other waste concentration methods $4,704 $4,000 - - - $4,704
-
gal
- -
07 4.112: Replace old machine with new automatic multi-station tool $418,000 $750,000 - - - - - $418,000
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $523,401 $871,300 $26,318
799,238
kWh
$11,779
-
kW-mo/yr
$42,600
-
MMBtu
$4,704
-
gal
$20,000
-
lb
$418,000
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $3,424 $1,800 $2,354
91,735
kWh
$1,070
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Other Liquid (haz) Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Increase in Production Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs