ITAC Assessment: NC0102
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: NC0102
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1996
Principal Product Meat products
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2013: Sausages and Other Prepared Meat Products
Sales Range $50
M
to 100
M
# of Employees 618
Plant Area 150,000
ft2
Annual Production 60,000,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 6,000
hrs
Location (State) North Carolina

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $786,222 24,859,320
kWh
Electricity Demand $421,598 33,258
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $171,247 57,063
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $62,800 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $9,103

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
01 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $6,712 $4,725 $3,786
119,871
kWh
$2,926
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $764 $2,500 $685
21,688
kWh
$79
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
03 2.2623: Minimize condenser cooling water temperature $8,399 $2,500 $5,032
159,144
kWh
$3,367
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
04 2.1233: Analyze flue gas for proper air/fuel ratio $5,100 $700 - - $5,100
-
MMBtu
- - - -
05 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $2,369 $30 $1,352
42,790
kWh
$1,017
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - -
06 3.3133: Use other waste concentration methods $3,239 $5,000 - - - - $3,739
-
lb
$(-500.0) -
07 3.3131: Use evaporation to concentrate material $36,217 $30,000 $(-1,192.0)
(-37,808)
kWh
$(-1,341.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
- $43,750
-
Tgal
- - $(-5,000.0)
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $62,800 $45,455 $9,663
305,685
kWh
$6,048
-
kW-mo/yr
$5,100
-
MMBtu
$43,750
-
Tgal
$3,739
-
lb
$(-500.0) $(-5,000.0)
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $9,103 $8,200 $685
21,688
kWh
$79
-
kW-mo/yr
$5,100
-
MMBtu
- $3,739
-
lb
$(-500.0) -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Water Disposal Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs