ITAC Assessment: MS0395
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: MS0395
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2022
Principal Product HEPA Filters
NAICS 541380: Testing Laboratories
SIC 8734: Testing Laboratories
Sales Range less than $500
k
# of Employees 42
Plant Area 59,757
ft2
Annual Production 1
units
Production Hrs. Annual 2,250
hrs
Location (State) Mississippi

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $117,720 1,759,200
kWh
Electricity Demand $40,624 3,395
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $51,540 4,359
MMBtu
Waste Disposal Costs
Water Usage $6,482 1,535
Tgal
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS $216,366
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $20,189 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $11,400

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings
01 2.2622: Replace existing chiller with high efficiency model $6,342 $210,000 $6,013
89,741
kWh
$329
-
kW-mo/yr
-
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $10,723 $18,748 $9,918
148,029
kWh
$805
-
kW-mo/yr
-
03 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $677 $540 $677
10,114
kWh
- -
04 2.4321: Upgrade obsolete equipment $2,447 $15,480 - - $2,447
-
MMBtu
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $20,189 $244,768 $16,608
247,884
kWh
$1,135
-
kW-mo/yr
$2,447
-
MMBtu
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $11,400 $19,288 $10,595
158,143
kWh
$805
-
kW-mo/yr
-
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs