ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: MI0328
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: MI0328
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
See Complete Announcement
Grant Program - Open Solicitation
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Find Something New - Open Random Assessment MAIN ITAC SITE VERSION [FOR BETA TESTING ONLY]
University of Miami University of Miami
Assessment Year 2018
Principal Product Cosmetic Products
NAICS 325611: Soap and Other Detergent Manufacturing
SIC 2844: Perfumes, Cosmetics, and Other Toilet Preparations
Sales Range $50
M
to 100
M
# of Employees 500
Plant Area 200,000
ft2
Annual Production 20,000,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 7,488
hrs
Location (State) Florida

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $271,987 5,540,000
kWh
Electricity Demand $118,114 9,404
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $67,345 -
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS $457,446
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $104,130 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $52,016

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Administrative Changes Savings
01 2.2628: Utilize a less expensive cooling method $32,062 $127,500 $19,521
397,578
kWh
$6,841
-
kW-mo/yr
$5,700
02 2.7425: Clean or color roof to reduce solar load $22,847 $63,840 $16,918
344,568
kWh
$5,929
-
kW-mo/yr
-
03 2.7496: Install partitions to reduce size of conditioned space $19,041 $25,680 $14,100
287,183
kWh
$4,941
-
kW-mo/yr
-
04 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $11,135 $1,660 $8,256
168,146
kWh
$2,879
-
kW-mo/yr
-
05 2.7221: Lower temperature during the winter season and vice-versa $5,680 $40 $4,203
85,604
kWh
$1,477
-
kW-mo/yr
-
06 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $4,307 $13,190 $1,746
35,558
kWh
$2,561
-
kW-mo/yr
-
07 2.7121: Utilize daylight whenever possible in lieu of artificial light $3,824 $5,032 $2,712
55,243
kWh
$1,112
-
kW-mo/yr
-
08 2.7134: Use photocell controls $2,086 $5,544 $2,086
42,491
kWh
- -
09 2.4239: Eliminate or reduce compressed air usage $1,121 $1,501 $795
16,195
kWh
$326
-
kW-mo/yr
-
10 2.7134: Use photocell controls $1,016 $2,773 $456
9,279
kWh
$560
-
kW-mo/yr
-
11 2.2511: Insulate bare equipment $1,011 $206 $749
15,250
kWh
$262
-
kW-mo/yr
-
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $104,130 $246,966 $71,542
1,457,095
kWh
$26,888
-
kW-mo/yr
$5,700
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $52,016 $93,580 $37,172
757,084
kWh
$14,844
-
kW-mo/yr
-
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Administrative Changes Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs