ITAC Assessment: MI0124
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: MI0124
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2006
Principal Product Industrial Adhesives
NAICS 325520: Adhesive Manufacturing
SIC 2891: Adhesives and Sealants
Sales Range $100
M
to 500
M
# of Employees 82
Plant Area 75,000
ft2
Annual Production 235,000,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 7,200
hrs
Location (State) Florida

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $91,855 1,633,560
kWh
Electricity Demand $23,268 2,800
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $14,961 -
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $55,540 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* -

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $17,063 $40,180 $13,673
245,606
kWh
$3,390
-
kW-mo/yr
02 2.4239: Eliminate or reduce compressed air usage $3,719 $2,400 $2,979
53,520
kWh
$740
-
kW-mo/yr
03 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $1,540 $28 $1,208
21,703
kWh
$332
-
kW-mo/yr
04 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $950 $1,018 $792
14,225
kWh
$158
-
kW-mo/yr
05 2.1321: Replace fossil fuel equipment with electrical equipment $32,268 $31,176 $32,268
579,627
kWh
-
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $55,540 $74,802 $50,920
914,681
kWh
$4,620
-
kW-mo/yr
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED - - - -
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs