Assessment Year | 2002 |
---|---|
Principal Product | Commercial Printing |
NAICS |
n/a
|
SIC | 2752: Commercial Printing, Lithographic |
Sales Range | $5 M to 10M |
# of Employees | 35 |
Plant Area |
25,000
ft2
|
Annual Production | 1,400,000
lb
|
Production Hrs. Annual | 4,420
hrs
|
Location (State) | Vermont |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Electricity Usage | $37,221 | 527,428 |
kWh
|
$0.071 |
Electricity Demand | $39,788 | 2,640 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$15.07 |
Electricity Fees | $1,080 | - |
|
- |
LPG | $8,033 | 823 |
MMBtu
|
$9.76 |
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $7,733 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $3,595 |
Recommendations
# | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | LPG Savings | One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | 2.3131: Reschedule plant operations or reduce load to avoid peaks | $2,609 | - | - | - | $2,609 | |
02 | 2.2711: Utilize outside air instead of conditioned air for drying | $2,161 | $2,000 |
$337
5,274
kWh
|
$1,824
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
03 | 2.7224: Reduce space conditioning during non-working hours | $1,389 | $500 |
$461
4,688
kWh
|
$928
-
MMBtu
|
- | |
04 | 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts | $627 | $4,496 |
$627
9,401
kWh
|
- | - | |
05 | 2.7124: Make a practice of turning off lights when not needed | $796 | $800 |
$796
11,028
kWh
|
- | - | |
06 | 2.6218: Turn off equipment when not in use | $106 | - |
$106
1,653
kWh
|
- | - | |
07 | 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required | $45 | - |
$45
659
kWh
|
- | - | |
TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $7,733 | $7,796 |
$2,372
32,703
kWh
|
$2,752
-
MMBtu
|
$2,609 | ||
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $3,595 | $2,500 |
$843
10,621
kWh
|
$2,752
-
MMBtu
|
- | ||
Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | LPG Savings | One-time Revenue or Avoided Cost Savings |
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs