ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: LM0102
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: LM0102
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
See Complete Announcement
Grant Program - Open Solicitation
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Find Something New - Open Random Assessment MAIN ITAC SITE VERSION [FOR BETA TESTING ONLY]
Loyola Marymount University Loyola Marymount University
Assessment Year 2005
Principal Product aerospace parts
NAICS 336419: Other Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
SIC 3769: Guided Missile Space Vehicle Parts and Auxiliary Equipment, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 54
Plant Area 46,500
ft2
Annual Production 150
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 5,066
hrs
Location (State) California

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $196,875 1,816,509
kWh
Electricity Demand $24,705 4,572
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $12,489 -
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $1,714,972 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $1,264,972

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Primary Product Savings
01 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $1,202 $500 $1,074
9,526
kWh
$128
-
kW-mo/yr
-
02 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $2,058 $1,000 $1,839
16,302
kWh
$219
-
kW-mo/yr
-
03 2.4239: Eliminate or reduce compressed air usage $3,712 $200 $3,288
29,148
kWh
$424
-
kW-mo/yr
-
04 4.132: Purchase new equipment to reduce material use / cost $450,000 $15,000 - - $450,000
05 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck $1,258,000 $1,250,000 - - $1,258,000
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $1,714,972 $1,266,700 $6,201
54,976
kWh
$771
-
kW-mo/yr
$1,708,000
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $1,264,972 $1,251,700 $6,201
54,976
kWh
$771
-
kW-mo/yr
$1,258,000
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs