ITAC Assessment: KU0515
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: KU0515
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1999
Principal Product roll-forming machinery
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3547: Rolling Mill Machinery and Equipment
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 230
Plant Area 160,875
ft2
Annual Production 75
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 4,602
hrs
Location (State) Kansas

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $72,913 2,877,198
kWh
Electricity Demand $67,115 8,328
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $7,469 1,747
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $408,930 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $406,450

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Personnel Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Primary Product Savings
01 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $2,780 $400 $1,520
59,789
kWh
$1,260
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - -
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $1,660 $2,430 $250
9,672
kWh
$390
-
kW-mo/yr
- $1,020 - -
03 2.2437: Recover waste heat from equipment $820 $2,540 - - $820
-
MMBtu
- - -
04 2.6218: Turn off equipment when not in use $530 - $530
20,516
kWh
- - - - -
05 3.5146: Utilize a central coolant system for cleaning and reuse of metal working fluid $3,140 $7,830 - - - - $3,140 -
06 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck $400,000 $602,110 - - - - - $400,000
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $408,930 $615,310 $2,300
89,977
kWh
$1,650
-
kW-mo/yr
$820
-
MMBtu
$1,020 $3,140 $400,000
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $406,450 $610,340 $2,050
80,305
kWh
$1,260
-
kW-mo/yr
- - $3,140 $400,000
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Personnel Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings Primary Product Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs