ITAC Assessment: KU0033
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: KU0033
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1982
Principal Product SILK SCREEN PRINTING INK
NAICS
n/a
SIC 2893: Printing Ink
Sales Range $5
M
to 10
M
# of Employees 48
Plant Area
n/a
Annual Production 260
Tgal
Production Hrs. Annual 4,500
hrs
Location (State) Kansas

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $36,368 527,843
kWh
Natural Gas $8,679 3,118
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $4,594 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $4,594

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $2,443 $3,935 $2,443
35,463
kWh
-
02 2.6221: Use most efficient equipment at it's maximum capacity and less efficient equipment only when necessary $1,573 - $1,573
22,860
kWh
-
03 2.1233: Analyze flue gas for proper air/fuel ratio $509 $700 - $509
-
MMBtu
04 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $69 - $69
879
kWh
-
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $4,594 $4,635 $4,085
59,202
kWh
$509
-
MMBtu
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $4,594 $4,635 $4,085
59,202
kWh
$509
-
MMBtu
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs