ITAC Assessment: IA0352
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: IA0352
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2004
Principal Product telescopic high-reach forklifts
NAICS 333924: Industrial Truck, Tractor, Trailer, and Stacker Machinery Manufacturing
SIC 3537: Industrial Trucks, Tractors, Trailers, and Stackers
Sales Range $100
M
to 500
M
# of Employees 150
Plant Area 130,000
ft2
Annual Production 1,650
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 6,136
hrs
Location (State) South Dakota

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $71,155 1,982,400
kWh
Electricity Demand $52,387 6,720
kW-mo/yr
Natural Gas $61,881 8,651
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $902,340 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $895,114

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Electricity Fees Savings Natural Gas Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Primary Raw Material Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
01 2.3212: Optimize plant power factor $3,699 $3,750 - - $3,699 - - - - -
02 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $1,216 $416 $1,181
33,016
kWh
$455
-
kW-mo/yr
- - $(-420.0) - - -
03 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $5,245 $6 $2,287
63,700
kWh
$2,958
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
04 2.2437: Recover waste heat from equipment $3,182 $1 - - - $3,182
-
MMBtu
- - - -
05 2.7312: Minimize use of outside make-up air for ventilation except when used for economizer cycle $12,016 $2 $419
11,658
kWh
$161
-
kW-mo/yr
- $11,436
-
MMBtu
- - - -
06 2.4111: Utilize energy-efficient belts and other improved mechanisms $528 $136 $283
7,890
kWh
$245
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
07 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $4,595 $6,618 $3,319
92,448
kWh
$1,276
-
kW-mo/yr
- - - - - -
08 3.7198: Reduce / eliminate use of disposable product $4,044 $440 - - - - $2,800 - - $1,244
09 4.111: Add equipment/ operators to reduce production bottleneck $867,815 $171 - - - - $72,800 $44,265 $750,750 -
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $902,340 $11,540 $7,489
208,712
kWh
$5,095
-
kW-mo/yr
$3,699 $14,618
-
MMBtu
$75,180 $44,265 $750,750 $1,244
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $895,114 $11,099 $7,489
208,712
kWh
$5,095
-
kW-mo/yr
$3,699 $11,436
-
MMBtu
$72,380 $44,265 $750,750 -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Electricity Fees Savings Natural Gas Savings Personnel Changes Savings Administrative Changes Savings Primary Raw Material Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs