| Assessment Year | 1997 |
|---|---|
| Principal Product | Powder coating |
| NAICS |
n/a
|
| SIC | 3479: Coating, Engraving, and Allied Services, Not Elsewhere Classified |
| Sales Range | $1 M to 5M |
| # of Employees | 27 |
| Plant Area |
17,000
ft2
|
| Annual Production | 100,000
lb
|
| Production Hrs. Annual | 3,172
hrs
|
| Location (State) | New Jersey |
Facility Energy Cost and Usage
| Source | Yearly Cost | Usage | Unit Cost | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity Usage | $22,559 | 240,621 |
kWh
|
$0.094 |
| Electricity Demand | $10,307 | 1,264 |
kW-mo/yr
|
$8.15 |
| Electricity Fees | $(-5,665.0) | - |
|
- |
| Natural Gas | $42,705 | 8,990 |
MMBtu
|
$4.75 |
| TOTAL YEARLY COSTS | - | |||
| RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* | $30,387 |
See individual recommendations below
*Non-energy impacts included in savings.
|
||
| IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* | $1,474 | |||
Recommendations
| # | Description | Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Status | Electricity Usage Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings | Personnel Changes Savings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors | $163 | $260 |
$163
1,758
kWh
|
- | - | - | |
| 02 | 2.2511: Insulate bare equipment | $1,474 | $2,500 | - |
$1,474
-
MMBtu
|
- | - | |
| 03 | 3.6193: Install equipment (eg compactor) to reduce disposal costs | $2,400 | $6,500 | - | - |
$2,400
-
lb
|
- | |
| 04 | 2.7134: Use photocell controls | $850 | $1,200 |
$850
9,086
kWh
|
- | - | - | |
| 05 | 3.5311: Recover and reuse waste material | $500 | - | - | - |
$500
-
lb
|
- | |
| 06 | 4.513: Re-arrange equipment layout to reduce labor costs | $25,000 | - | - | - | - | $25,000 | |
| TOTAL RECOMMENDED | $30,387 | $10,460 |
$1,013
10,844
kWh
|
$1,474
-
MMBtu
|
$2,900
-
lb
|
$25,000 | ||
| TOTAL IMPLEMENTED | $1,474 | $2,500 | - |
$1,474
-
MMBtu
|
- | - | ||
| Yearly Savings* | Imp'd Cost* | Electricity Usage Savings | Natural Gas Savings | Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings | Personnel Changes Savings | |||
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs