ITAC Assessment: HO0141
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: HO0141
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1997
Principal Product Sheet metal fabricators
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3444: Sheet Metal Work
Sales Range $5
M
to 10
M
# of Employees 135
Plant Area 60,000
ft2
Annual Production 1,300,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 2,860
hrs
Location (State) New York

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $23,076 387,163
kWh
Electricity Demand $42,860 1,872
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $4,772 -
Natural Gas $18,448 1,957
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $143,736 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $2,232

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Water Disposal Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings
01 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $7,534 $16,787 $2,866
47,773
kWh
$4,668
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
02 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $798 $3,720 $798
13,189
kWh
- - - -
03 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $1,226 $400 $471
7,913
kWh
$755
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
04 2.7111: Reduce illumination to minimum necessary levels $1,306 $200 $505
8,499
kWh
$801
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
05 3.4111: Use closed cycle process to minimize waste water production $2,232 $1,000 - - $2,232
-
Tgal
- -
06 3.6193: Install equipment (eg compactor) to reduce disposal costs $5,640 - - - - $5,640
-
lb
-
07 4.513: Re-arrange equipment layout to reduce labor costs $75,000 $40,000 - - - - $75,000
08 4.514: Re-arrange equipment layout to reduce handling costs $50,000 $50,000 - - - - $50,000
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $143,736 $112,107 $4,640
77,374
kWh
$6,224
-
kW-mo/yr
$2,232
-
Tgal
$5,640
-
lb
$125,000
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $2,232 $1,000 - - $2,232
-
Tgal
- -
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Water Disposal Savings Solid Waste (non-haz) Savings Personnel Changes Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs